Roberta Wolfson
  • Home
  • Research
  • Teaching
  • Antiracism
  • Blog
  • CV
  • Contact

Blog

2021 American Studies Association Virtual Convention

10/15/2021

0 Comments

 
This week I attended the 2021 American Studies Association Convention, which was held virtually from October 11-14, 2021. Organized around the presidential theme "Creativity within Revolt," this annual meeting sought to explore the following questions named in the convention program:
  • What imaginative and practical possibilities are (simultaneously) opened when people move against seemingly immovable systems of violent domination?
  • How might revolt itself be conceptualized as a creative and artistic form, catalyzing as it actively produces new ways of interacting with what Sylvia Wynter calls the "praxis of human being?"
  • By extension, what might be gained by a radically creative interpretation of revolt that considers the breadth and particularity of different peoples' vulnerabilities to the American Civilizational project, and thus expands the (living) archive of radical and liberationist texts, movements, artistic productions, pedagogies, and infrastructures addressed (and often constituted) by ASA scholars?
  • What might it mean to both apprehend and respond to the creative acts of people in revolt, and how might such creativity enable other ways of envisioning and making sociality, community, bodily and spiritual integrity, and radical futurity?
Hundreds of ASA scholars, activists, and educators from around the world came together virtually to answer these questions. I was inspired to see that the challenge of being physically distanced during this pandemic did not hinder our commitment to holding visionary discussions and building a critical sense of community.
Picture
With my fellow panelists, (clockwise) Nicole Dib, Joseph Darda, Shane Hall, and Jay Garcia.
I contributed to these discussions by presenting my own research on a panel called "The Containment and Revolt of Antiracist Literature" on October 13th. This panel sought to examine how and why literature has been conceptualized as a vehicle through which to challenge white supremacy, as well as how authors and readers both creatively use narrative to advance antiracist goals and revolt against the constraints of feel-good liberal antiracism.

My fellow panelists (pictured above in our virtual conference room) included Nicole Dib, an assistant professor of English at Southern Utah University, who demonstrated how John Okada's 1957 novel No-No Boy employs the trope of automobility to critique Japanese incarceration during World War II; Joseph Darda, an assistant professor of English and comparative race and ethnic studies at Texas Christian University, who explored the development throughout the 1940s of so-called "race novels," such as Richard Wright's Native Son, Lillian Smith's Strange Fruit, and Willard Motley's Knock on Any Door; and Shane Hall, an assistant professor of environmental studies at Salisbury University, who demonstrated how Omar El Akkad's 2017 climate fiction novel American War reinforces racist ideologies under the guise of resource security. Our session chair was Jay Garcia, an associate professor of comparative literature at New York University, who responded to our papers with stimulating questions and commentary.

My presentation, titled "(Anti)Racist Reading Practices and the U.S. War on Terror in Mohsin Hamid's The Reluctant Fundamentalist," explored how Hamid's novel rewrites the history of the 9/11 tragedy from a position of counter-colonial resistance in order to denounce the post-9/11 U.S. counterterror state's misinformed, damaging, and racist attempts to read the racialized Muslim body. I argued that by exposing the challenges of reading and interpreting (racial) others in the post-9/11 U.S. counterterror state, The Reluctant Fundamentalist subverts the racist reading practices of the post-9/11 U.S. security state and destabilizes the binary frameworks of good/bad, us/them, Christian/Muslim that fuel the one-dimensional Islamophobic rhetoric used to justify the neo-imperial abuses of the U.S. War on Terror.

If you'd like to learn more about my remarks, you can check out a full recording of my presentation below.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    About

    Check out this page for periodic updates about my research, teaching, and community work.

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • Research
  • Teaching
  • Antiracism
  • Blog
  • CV
  • Contact